Post by account_disabled on Mar 7, 2024 8:20:51 GMT
However, dowry can only be taken if there is a dowry bill, otherwise nothing can be done if it is not given. It would be beneficial to prepare the dowry bill with a lawyer. Is dowry mandatory? Mahr is not a mandatory gift in Turkish law. Dowry is a gift and even if it is not given, the marriage is valid. However, according to Islamic law, giving dowry is mandatory. Once the dowry is given, it is not permissible to take it back.
Those who want to secure dowry must obtain a dowry France Telegram Number Data bill. Decisions of the General Assembly of the Supreme Court of Appeals Regarding Dowry Receivables The plaintiff woman claimed that her defendant husband signed the dowry bill dated 02.08.2000 before they got married on 08.08.2000, but despite their separation due to her husband's faulty actions, the jewelery mentioned in the dowry bill was never delivered to her; The defendant, on the other hand, argued that the jewelery specified in the dowry bill was worn and handed over to the plaintiff at the wedding, and that they remained under the plaintiff's control during the separation. 27.
To point out, it is clear that the jewelery that the plaintiff is suing for is not the gold worn at the wedding, but the jewelery that was stated to have been given with a dowry bill before the marriage. 28. The issue of which party has the burden of proof must be resolved within the framework of the above-mentioned legal regulation. Although there is a presumption that the jewelery belongs to the woman and that she will not leave it with her, in the concrete case, the defendant must prove with written evidence that the jewelery stated to be given in the dowry bill was delivered to the plaintiff.
Those who want to secure dowry must obtain a dowry France Telegram Number Data bill. Decisions of the General Assembly of the Supreme Court of Appeals Regarding Dowry Receivables The plaintiff woman claimed that her defendant husband signed the dowry bill dated 02.08.2000 before they got married on 08.08.2000, but despite their separation due to her husband's faulty actions, the jewelery mentioned in the dowry bill was never delivered to her; The defendant, on the other hand, argued that the jewelery specified in the dowry bill was worn and handed over to the plaintiff at the wedding, and that they remained under the plaintiff's control during the separation. 27.
To point out, it is clear that the jewelery that the plaintiff is suing for is not the gold worn at the wedding, but the jewelery that was stated to have been given with a dowry bill before the marriage. 28. The issue of which party has the burden of proof must be resolved within the framework of the above-mentioned legal regulation. Although there is a presumption that the jewelery belongs to the woman and that she will not leave it with her, in the concrete case, the defendant must prove with written evidence that the jewelery stated to be given in the dowry bill was delivered to the plaintiff.