Post by account_disabled on Mar 4, 2024 7:10:40 GMT
It is estimated that half of the population in the United States and France does not receive any inheritance and that the sons and daughters of the poorest in France receive less than of the total transferred inheritance while the richest receive between and . In Latin America there is no clear data but it is logical to assume that given the more regressive distribution of wealth and income in the region the situation is more regressive. Despite this evidence the inheritance tax is resisted by a large part of people with the argument that it represents a mechanism of family social mobility people are stimulated to work and accumulate wealth to transfer it and improve employment opportunities. life of their descendants.
This argument is valid and surely explains positive behaviors of many Russia Mobile Number List groups that have managed to improve the life opportunities of their descendants. a nontaxable inheritance floor and with measures such as the exemption of a number of properties whose function is to be a family home or the preservation of the capital of family businesses. But this does not justify the absence of a progressive tax for those at the top of the distribution of wealth. The tax on inheritances legacies and donations should be levied on all transfers of this type made throughout a persons life to avoid evasion through fractioning. The progressive taxes mentioned not only have the purpose of increasing fiscal resources in an efficient and fair manner but also allow for better joint supervision because the information of each one serves to compare with the others.
This strategy would be much more powerful if it were coordinated internationally so it would be positive if it were addressed as a central issue on the agendas of the different and often inoperative policy coordination bodies of the Latin American countries. But to be socially acceptable the funds raised should be allocated consistently and transparently. To achieve this two policies are suggested a basic universal income and a basic universal inheritance for all people from a certain age.
This argument is valid and surely explains positive behaviors of many Russia Mobile Number List groups that have managed to improve the life opportunities of their descendants. a nontaxable inheritance floor and with measures such as the exemption of a number of properties whose function is to be a family home or the preservation of the capital of family businesses. But this does not justify the absence of a progressive tax for those at the top of the distribution of wealth. The tax on inheritances legacies and donations should be levied on all transfers of this type made throughout a persons life to avoid evasion through fractioning. The progressive taxes mentioned not only have the purpose of increasing fiscal resources in an efficient and fair manner but also allow for better joint supervision because the information of each one serves to compare with the others.
This strategy would be much more powerful if it were coordinated internationally so it would be positive if it were addressed as a central issue on the agendas of the different and often inoperative policy coordination bodies of the Latin American countries. But to be socially acceptable the funds raised should be allocated consistently and transparently. To achieve this two policies are suggested a basic universal income and a basic universal inheritance for all people from a certain age.